Category: All Networks
Extraordinary Circumstances Exception
A facility can request an exception or extension (if applicable) to various quality reporting requirements due to extraordinary circumstances beyond the control of the facility. Such circumstances may include (but are not limited to) natural disasters (such as a severe hurricane or flood), systemic problems with CMS data collection systems that directly affected the ability of facilities to submit data, or extreme circumstances preventing facilities from electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) or electronic health record (EHR)-based reporting (e.g., extraordinary infrastructure challenges or vendor issues outside of the facility’s control). This also includes temporary closure of the facility. To request an exception or extension, facility administration must complete and submit the “ECE request form”, found here, to the ESRD QIP mailbox at ESRDQIP@cms.hhs.gov. In order for a facility to prevent loss of points under QIP this form must be submitted within 90 calendar days of the extraordinary circumstance following the end of the last reporting period.
Updating Notifications and Accretions in CROWNWeb
Notification—a discrepancy in patient data between what CMS and the Social Security Administration (CMS/SSA) database has on record and what exists in CROWNWeb.
Accretion—a record that exists in a CMS/SSA database and believed to be ESRD, but has not been admitted into CROWNWeb as a patient. (An accretion may also occur for existing patients in CROWNWeb whose key identifiers are missing or incorrect.)
All corrections to the data must be made through CROWNWeb. When updating Notifications and Accretions in CROWNWeb:
- All facilities (including batch submitting organizations) are responsible for correcting and maintaining their own data.
- New notifications and accretions should be resolved within 15 days and those that are under investigation are to be resolved within 30 days.
- The Network is responsible for the oversight of notifications and accretions and will keep facilities informed as these issues arise for correction.
Considering the Best Practice of Patient Involvement in Quality Improvement
Education: A Critical Factor in Understanding De-escalation Techniques
Reducing Catheter Rates By Preserving Vascular Access
Understanding the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Quality Incentive Program (QIP)
Living Non-Related Transplant and Paired Kidney Exchange
CDC Extends Deadline for Submission of NHSN “Agreement to Participate and Consent” form to June 15, 2018
- Currently enrolled facilities are required to accept the new Agreement to Participate and Consent electronically by June 15, 2018.
- If a facility fails to re-consent by the deadline, its NHSN functionality will be suspended until the consent form is accepted.
- Newly enrolled facilities must consent within 60 days of enrolling in NHSN.
- After submitting enrollment forms, the person(s) listed as the Dialysis Component Primary Contact and the Healthcare Personnel Primary Contact must log in to the enrolled facility in NHSN.
- On the Dialysis component homepage, the primary contact should review the electronic consent form and then check the ‘Accept’ box and click ‘Submit’.
- For more information contact NHSN@cdc.gov with “consent form” in the subject line or visit https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/about-nhsn/faq-agreement-to-participate.html.
CMS Introduces the ESRD QIP Listserv on QualityNet
Effective at the end of April 2018, CMS will distribute program updates and other important communications exclusively via the End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program (ESRD QIP) listserv. This listserv will replace current email blasts from the ESRD QIP mailbox.
Signing up is easy! Simply go here to create your ESRD QIP listserv account by selecting the option for the ESRD QIP. CMS will use the online listserv to distribute communications about changes to ESRD QIP policy and process to the ESRD QIP stakeholder community. You will need to create a user account to receive future communications from the listserv.
If you have any additional questions or concerns, please contact the ESRD QIP team using the ESRD QIP Q&A Tool.
Offering Support for Patients Beyond the Dialysis Center
When starting dialysis, patients are often overwhelmed with the adjustment to their new lifestyle. Navigating end stage renal disease, especially for new patients, can become frustrating, and sometimes can lead to patients feeling defeated by their chronic illness. Additionally, patients experience feelings of loneliness or isolation.
According to the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP), becoming involved in a support or adjustment group offers patients emotional support, reduces the feelings associated with loneliness, and provides a safe and secure platform to discuss feelings and emotions commonly associated with the diagnosis of renal failure. A patient making the decision to attend a support or adjustment groups signifies the first step towards acceptance and understanding of their diagnosis.
Initiating, implementing, and sustaining a support group can have its challenges. AAKP offers the Community Patient Support Group Guidebook. The resource was created to assist patients, family and caregivers, and dialysis providers with starting patient support or adjustment group in your service area. The AAKP website offers several ideas for session topics and patient education materials. Visit http://www.aakp.org/ for additional information or call (800)749-AAKP.
Shared Decision Making: The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
In 1988, researchers from the Harvard Medical School, on behalf of the Pickler Institute, developed the model known as the Eight Dimensions of Patient-Centered Care. The model challenges clinicians to cultivate a better understanding of a patient’s illness and address their needs. Secondary to knowledge gain, patients are viewed as equals to clinicians when making decisions about their healthcare.
A component of patient-centered care includes the concept of shared decision making or a process where patients work alongside their clinicians to make decisions about their treatments and care plans. Clinical evidence is reviewed to weigh the risks and outcomes associated with the decisions keeping a focus on the patient’s preferences and values. Benefits that come from patients engaging in the shared decision process include understanding their health along with the pros and cons of different options, being better prepared to collaborate with their healthcare team, and most importantly they are more likely to follow through on their decisions. For more information and tools on shared decision making, visit the New England Journal of Medicine at www.nejm.org and the National Learning Consortium at www.healthit.gov.